Australian Shareholder Agreements Explained: Key Clauses & Expert Answers

Starting a business with partners is exciting, but what happens when you inevitably disagree? A Shareholder Agreement is the single most important document for protecting your investment and your business relationships.

A shareholder agreement is a private contract between a company’s shareholders that outlines their rights, responsibilities, and the rules for managing the company. Think of it as a “business pre-nup” that sets the ground rules before any problems arise, ensuring clarity and a fair process for all parties involved.

Why Every Australian Company Needs a Shareholder Agreement

A shareholder agreement is a vital safety net. Without one, you risk:

  • Costly and stressful shareholder disputes that can paralyse the business.

  • Ambiguity when a shareholder wishes to exit, or in the event of death, disability, or divorce.

  • Unwanted third parties acquiring shares in your company.

  • The absence of a fair, pre-agreed method for valuing shares.

  • Management deadlocks on critical decisions, particularly in 50/50 companies.

10 Key Clauses Your Shareholder Agreement Must Include

While every agreement should be tailored, these ten clauses are foundational for protecting all parties.

1. Parties & Company Details

This clause formally identifies all signing parties (the individual shareholders and often the company itself) and lists the company’s official details, including its Australian Company Number (ACN).

2. Roles & Responsibilities

While day-to-day duties are covered in employment contracts, this clause can set out high-level expectations, particularly for founders, such as commitments to working full-time in the business or key responsibilities for securing funding or technology.

3. Share Ownership & Structure

This section clearly records the number and class of shares held by each shareholder. It confirms the initial ownership percentages and the rights attached to different share classes, if any (e.g., preference shares vs. ordinary shares), consistent with the company’s power under s 254A of the Corporations Act 2001.

4. Decision Making & Voting Rights

This is a critical governance clause. It specifies which decisions require a simple majority (>50%) versus a “special majority” (often 75%) or even unanimous consent. This is a key protection for minority shareholders, as it can give them a veto over major decisions like selling the company or issuing a large block of new shares.

5. Board of Directors

The agreement should outline the rules for board composition, including granting specific shareholders the right to appoint a director. This ensures representation at the management level. It also details the process for removing directors, which can be different from the default rules in the Corporations Act 2001.

6. Dispute Resolution

To avoid costly and public court battles, this clause mandates a structured, private process for resolving disagreements. It typically involves a multi-tiered approach: first, good faith negotiation, followed by formal mediation, and if that fails, binding arbitration.

7. Share Transfers & Restrictions

This clause controls who can own shares. It almost always includes pre-emptive rights, which force a shareholder wishing to sell to first offer their shares to the existing shareholders. This prevents shares from being sold to unknown or undesirable third parties and reinforces the replaceable rule in s 254D for proprietary companies.

8. “Shotgun” / Buy-Sell Provisions

This is a powerful mechanism for breaking a deadlock, especially in a 50/50 company. One party can trigger the clause by naming a price for their shares. The other party then has the choice to either buy the first party’s shares at that price or sell their own shares at that same price. This guarantees a resolution by forcing a buyout.

9. Drag-Along & Tag-Along Rights

These clauses manage a full sale of the company. A drag-along right allows a majority to force a minority to sell their shares during a takeover, preventing a small shareholder from blocking a beneficial deal. A tag-along right protects the minority by allowing them to join in a sale initiated by the majority and receive the same price and terms.

10. Confidentiality & Non-Compete

This clause protects the company’s intellectual property and business interests. It prevents departing shareholders from taking confidential information or immediately setting up a competing business in the same market for a reasonable period.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Our experience shows several common pitfalls:

  • Using a Template: Generic templates fail to address your specific business needs and can be unenforceable.

  • Waiting Too Long: Creating an agreement after a dispute has already started is far more difficult and contentious.

  • Vague Valuation Clauses: Failing to specify a clear process for valuing shares is a primary cause of exit disputes.

  • Ignoring Deadlock: Not including a mechanism like a “shotgun” clause for 50/50 companies can lead to business paralysis.

FAQ: Answering Your Questions

How much does a shareholder agreement cost?

The cost varies based on the complexity of the business and the negotiations required. However, it should be viewed as a crucial investment. The cost of drafting a proper agreement is a fraction of the expense of a shareholder dispute or litigation down the line.

Can I use a shareholder agreement template?

We strongly advise against it. A template cannot account for your company’s unique structure, the specific intentions of the parties, or nuances of Australian corporate law. An unenforceable clause in a template agreement can render a key protection useless when you need it most.

What happens if a shareholder dies or gets divorced?

The agreement provides a clear process. It typically includes clauses that give the remaining shareholders the right to buy the departing shareholder’s shares (often funded by key-person insurance) at a pre-agreed valuation, preventing shares from passing to a deceased’s estate or an ex-spouse.

Do we need an agreement if we are a 50/50 company?

Absolutely. A 50/50 company is at the highest risk of complete deadlock, where the two parties cannot agree on a critical decision. A shareholder agreement with clear deadlock provisions (like a shotgun clause) is the only effective way to resolve such a stalemate without winding up the company.

When should we create a shareholder agreement?

As early as possible. The best time is at the company’s inception, when all founders are aligned on their vision and goals. It is much easier to agree on the rules of the game before any disputes have arisen.

A well-drafted shareholder agreement is not a sign of mistrust; it’s a blueprint for success and a vital safety net for your business. Don’t leave your company’s future to chance.

Contact our expert corporate lawyers today for a no-obligation consultation to draft an agreement that protects your interests.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information and does not constitute legal advice. The content is based on the Corporations Act 2001 and associated annotations current to mid-2025.

Get Expert Legal Advice

Navigating the complexities of corporate governance and shareholder agreements requires expert legal guidance. If you are establishing a new company, reviewing your existing governance framework, or require assistance with amending your shareholder agreement, our team of corporate law specialists can provide tailored advice. Contact us today to ensure your company’s architectural blueprint is built for success.

Contact us Now to Draft Your Shareholder Agreement?

Draft with confidence: Key Clauses & Expert Answers

How our strategic advice and guidance help clients protect the companies.

Key answers to help you draft your perfect agreement

Shareholder Agreement FAQs

A shareholder agreement is one of the most effective tools for protecting the rights and investment of a minority shareholder. While the Corporations Act 2001 provides some protections against oppressive conduct, a shareholder agreement contractually guarantees rights that a minority shareholder would not otherwise have.

Key protective clauses include:

  • Veto Rights: The agreement can grant minority shareholders the power to veto certain major decisions. This means that actions like selling significant company assets, issuing a large number of new shares, or taking on substantial debt would require their consent, preventing the majority from making transformative decisions without their approval.

  • Tag-Along Rights: This is a critical exit provision. If a majority shareholder decides to sell their shares to a third party, the tag-along clause gives the minority shareholder the right to “tag along” and sell their shares to the same buyer on the same terms and for the same price. This ensures they are not left behind with a new, unknown majority partner.

  • Anti-Dilution (Pre-emptive Rights): To prevent their ownership percentage from being unfairly diluted, the agreement will include pre-emptive rights. As outlined in the replaceable rule in s 254D of the Act, this requires the company to offer any new shares to existing shareholders proportionally before offering them to outside investors.

  • Guaranteed Board Representation: A minority shareholder can be contractually guaranteed a seat on the board of directors, ensuring their perspective is part of the company’s strategic management and giving them access to company information.

Where a conflict arises between the terms of a shareholder agreement and the company’s constitution, a well-drafted shareholder agreement will contain a supremacy clause. This clause explicitly states that the terms of the shareholder agreement shall prevail over the constitution.

Legally, this works as follows: The constitution is a statutory contract between the company and its members under s 140 of the Corporations Act 2001. The shareholder agreement is a separate private contract between the shareholders. The supremacy clause creates a contractual obligation on the shareholders to exercise their voting rights to amend the constitution to resolve the inconsistency.

For example, if the agreement states that a specific director must be appointed, but the constitution has a different procedure, the shareholders are contractually bound by the agreement to vote in a way that aligns the constitution with the agreement’s terms. Failure to do so would be a breach of the shareholder agreement, allowing the aggrieved party to sue for breach of contract.

No, a shareholder agreement cannot legally force a director to vote in a specific way that would breach their duties to the company. This is a fundamental principle of Australian corporate law.

Directors, even those appointed by a specific shareholder, owe their primary legal duties to the company as a whole. The most important of these duties is the duty to act in good faith in the best interests of the company and for a proper purpose, as required by s 181 of the Corporations Act 2001.

An agreement that attempts to “fetter the discretion” of a director—meaning it pre-determines how they must vote on board matters—is generally unenforceable because it would compel the director to prioritise the interests of their appointing shareholder over the interests of the company. A director must always apply their independent judgment to every decision. While shareholders can agree on how they will vote as shareholders (e.g., in a general meeting), they cannot bind a director’s vote at a board meeting.

A “deadlock” occurs when shareholders or directors with equal voting power cannot agree on a critical issue, paralysing the company’s operations. Shareholder agreements are designed to prevent this by including a structured, multi-tiered process for resolution.

Typical deadlock provisions include:

  • Tier 1: Escalation and Negotiation: The dispute is first formally referred to the company’s CEOs or Chairpersons for a set period of good faith negotiation to try and find a commercial solution.

  • Tier 2: Mediation: If negotiation fails, the parties are required to appoint an independent, accredited mediator to help facilitate a resolution. This is a confidential and non-binding process.

  • Tier 3: Buy-Sell or “Shotgun” Clause: If mediation is unsuccessful, a more drastic mechanism is triggered. In a typical “shotgun” clause, one shareholder (Party A) sets a price at which they value the shares. The other shareholder (Party B) then has the choice to either buy Party A’s shares at that price or sell their own shares to Party A at that same price. This mechanism forces a resolution by guaranteeing one party will exit the business.

  • Tier 4: Voluntary Winding Up: As a last resort, if all other mechanisms fail, the agreement may provide for an orderly and voluntary winding up of the company to return capital to the shareholders.

To prevent disputes, a shareholder agreement must clearly define the mechanism for valuing a departing shareholder’s shares. The valuation method often depends on whether the shareholder is a “good leaver” or a “bad leaver”.

Common valuation methods specified in an agreement include:

  • Agreed Formula: The parties agree on a specific formula in advance, such as a multiple of the company’s average annual earnings (EBIT or EBITDA) over a set period. This provides certainty but can become outdated if not reviewed.

  • Independent Expert Valuation: The most common approach is to have the shares valued by a mutually agreed-upon independent expert (such as a chartered accountant specialising in valuations). The agreement will set out the process for selecting the expert and the key principles they must follow. The expert’s decision is typically final and binding.

  • Good Leaver vs. Bad Leaver: The agreement will define these scenarios.

    • A “Good Leaver” (e.g., someone retiring, or leaving due to death or disability) is typically entitled to receive full fair market value for their shares.

    • A “Bad Leaver” (e.g., an employee-shareholder terminated for serious misconduct, or who breaches a non-compete clause) may be forced to sell their shares at a discount to fair market value (e.g., 80% of the valuation) as a punitive measure.

Let us draft your Shareholder Agreement today

Get expert help drafting and advising your companies governing documents

Get Strategic Advice Now